Chapter 1: The Communication Challenge
Marcus had the right answer. Eight months into Lakeshore's transformation, he had a validated purpose, a clear strategic direction, a capability model, and a reference model framework that gave every conversation a shared vocabulary. Then he walked into the board meeting. He opened with the capability heat map. Board chair Helen Marchetti was checking her phone by slide three. James Firth was flipping to the budget number. Diane caught Marcus's eye and gave a small shake of her head. The diagnosis was right. The communication was failing. This chapter names the models-to-meaning gap, the reason architecturally sound work routinely fails to influence decisions, and introduces the orientation that closes it: audience-first thinking. Not what you know. What the room needs to hear.
What You'll Be Able To Do
By the end of this chapter, you'll be able to:
- Diagnose a specific communication failure, and tell the difference between a problem with the architecture and a problem with how it was communicated.
- Explain why technically sound architecture work routinely fails to influence decisions, and what specifically causes that failure.
- Reverse your default communication sequence: start with what the audience cares about, not with what you know.
Sign In to Access This Course
Create a free account to access Communicating Business Architecture and start learning.